Comparison of dehydration systems in quality and chemical effects on sunflower seeds (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Scientific Reports
  • PMC11128449

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Comparison of dehydration systems in quality and chemical effects on sunflower seeds (1)

AboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports

Sci Rep. 2024; 14: 12014.

Published online 2024 May 26. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-62822-5

PMCID: PMC11128449

PMID: 38797730

A. A. Ortiz-Hernandez,1,2 M. A. Araiza-Esquivel,Comparison of dehydration systems in quality and chemical effects on sunflower seeds (2)3 L. Delgadillo-Ruiz,4 L. I. Espinosa-Vega,5 C. A. Olvera-Olvera,3 A. Lopez-Martinez,3 H. R. Vega-Carrillo,6 and J. J. Ortega-Sigala2

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement

Abstract

The present work investigates the quality and the chemical effects of dehydration, using a novel dehydration system based on an electromagnetic induction and low pressures technique, comparing it with the thermo-solar drying system. High oleic sunflower seeds, which are an important oil seed crop, were used due to the fact that they have a special place in the food industry. The seed samples were exposed to electromagnetic induction and low pressures by 0.5 and 1h, then several chemical characterizations were carried out, in the electrophoresis study, it was found that most proteins in the hull were degraded or denatured, some of them were lost during the time in the thermosolar dryer while in kernel keeps 94.9% of the concentration in control proteins. Otherwise, the electromagnetic induction dryer did not lose the most of proteins in the kernel keeping 99.1% in 0.5h and 98.4% in 1h, just degrading its concentration. Germination viability results did not show changes after 0.5h in the electromagnetic fields, but they decreased in 1h from 66 to 40% until the thermosolar method fell to 24% in 4h, both analysis results change proportionally with the treatment time and moisture content and the amount of the oxygen.

Subject terms: Proteins, Nutrition, Electrical and electronic engineering

Introduction

From 2016 to 2025, according to OCDE-FAO, the worldwide production of cereals and oilseed will increase by 13%. The 1.5% annual growth will be due to the vegetable oils demand1. On the other hand, according to USDA, world production is expected to grow by 10.8% from 2020 to 2029, due to the fact that world consumption will increase by 11.4% during the projection period2.

To avoid fungi and bacteria, and to be sold at competitive prices, the sunflower seed moisture must be less than 8%3. Dehydration can be performed using natural or artificial methods. The drawback of using natural dehydration methods is that these delay the harvest and crops have a larger risk of being impacted by pest or weather changes4.

Artificial dehydration methods include Infrared Drying (IRD), Desiccant Drying (DD), Reactance Window Drying (RWD), Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Drying (SCCO2D), Superheated Steam Drying (SSD), Heat Pump Drying (HPD), Radio Frequency Drying (RFD), Controlled sudden decompression to vacuum (Dénte Instantanée controlee) (DIC), Ultrasonic Drying (UD), Electric field technologies, for example, Electric Resistance Drying (ERD) or Electrohydrodynamic Drying (ED)5 and Thermo-solar drying (TSD) where solar energy is used to heat a flow of air that is used to eliminate the moisture in the samples. Regardless of the drying method the goal is to keep the quality of the product, therefore it is important to analyze the impact of the drying method on the dried product.

Induction heating is widely used, mainly in metalworking industry applications because it is a fast, precise, and repeatable non-contact method. It has been used to heat metals from 50 to 3000°C611. Electromagnetic Induction is used by very short time lapses of 0.5s to include months of heating processes11. Their variety of applications includes cooking metal melting, heat treatments, and welding8. However, induction heating has not been very used for dehydration applications3.

The dehydration procedure can have a negative impact on the seeds ranging from morphological changes to modifications in their chemical features. These drawbacks should be considered when any dehydration method is selected.

Highlights of the research paper previous Physical changes of sunflower seeds dehydrated by using electromagnetic induction and low pressures4, the dryer systems proposed (DEMI-LP) was 2.5 times shorter, Several interesting physical effects in seeds and kernels were monitored in this work: Finding an increment of 5% volumetric expansion coefficient, drying sunflower seeds reduces cut resistance from 2.5 to 1.5 Kgf, the porosity increases from 34.3 to 43.3% and from 45.4 to 50.2% (seeds and kernels), the spores of Aspergillus spp, disappear when are dehydrated by DEMI-LP method, represents significant advantages for the food dryer industry.

This work builds on a previous study aiming to compare two dehydration methods; thus, the objective of this work is to compare the effect of TSD and the Dryer with Electromagnetic Induction and Low Pressures (DEMI-LP) on the morphological changes, germination viability, bromatological features, mineral concentrations, densitometry and protein content of sunflower seeds.

Materials and methods

Biological material

The “Hi-Oleic” variety sunflower of the (Helianthus annuus species), is widely grown in Mexico taking 125days to mature. For this work, freshly harvested samples of sunflower seeds were used. The samples are the product of the first generation of the Pioneer® P64H41® precocious hybrid. The mean plant height is 111cm taking 60days for flowering and 95days for physiological maturity. The true density of the whole seeds was determined in grams per cubic decimeter (g/dm3) by filling a cubic decimeter container with sunflower seeds and averaging the mass measurements obtained three times. The results were reported as ranging from 45.05g/dm3 for control samples with 14.9% d.b. moisture to 36.43g/dm3 for samples dehydrated for 1.5h in DEM-LP4. The sunflower seeds were collected approximately 40km northwest of the capital of the state of Zacatecas (22.98° latitude, 102.28° longitude) in November 2017, when the plants showed all the visual characteristics of physiological maturity. Ten bulk samples (1kg each) of seeds were collected and transported to the DryLab-AORTech laboratories. Seeds were manually cleaned from foreign matter, eliminating broken or immature seeds.

Subsequently, in 2018, the dried samples underwent comprehensive analysis at the Biochemical Laboratory of the Academic Unit of Biology at the Autonomous University of Zacatecas, to conduct the majority of the analyses reported in this postdoctoral research project.

Dehydration methods

Thermo-solar dehydration (TSD)

The TSD was used to remove the moisture from the samples. This system has a closed chamber with concave solar concentrators where solar-heated air circulates.

Dehydration by electromagnetic induction and low-pressures (DEMI-LP)

The dehydration method employed in this study utilized the DEMI-LP device, which is currently pending patent approval12. Essentially, this system consists of a gyratory hermetic cylinder crafted from food-grade stainless steel, referred to as the chamber. This chamber is in thermal contact with a martensitic stainless-steel jacket, which is heated through an electromagnetic field operating at the resonance frequency of ferromagnetic materials. Previous research papers have reported on the physical changes induced by this method. Additionally, further details and a schematic diagram were included to enhance functional comprehension4. The electromagnetic field whose frequency is the same as the resonance frequency of ferromagnetic materials.

High-resolution transmission electron microscope

In order to detect morphological changes in the surface of dehydrated seeds, these were analyzed by obtaining micrographs 500× of the surface of the seeds using High-resolution transmission electron microscopy with a JEOL 2010F field emission microscope operating at 200kV. These micrographs were obtained at the Kleberg Advanced Microscopy Center at The University of Texas at San Antonio.

Germination viability

In the aim of evaluating the vigor of dehydrated sunflower seeds, the laboratory germination viability was determined. For this, 25 seeds were dehydrated for 0.5h with the DEMI-LP, 25 seeds were dehydrated for 1.0h with the DEMI-LP, and 25 seeds were dehydrated for 4h with the TSD, these methods were randomly selected. As a control, also 25 non-dehydrated seeds were selected. Each set was allocated in a container with 3% of calcium hypochlorite solution, the containers were shaken for 3min and the hypochlorite solution was eliminated, then the seeds were washed with sterilized water three times. In a germination tray, a hydrated pigment substrate with sterilized water was placed, and each seed was allocated in each well. The trays were kept inside the germination chamber at a controlled temperature of about 25°C for 15days. Once the germination time elapsed, the germinated seeds were considered and counted when they presented radicle emergence ISTA (1999)13.

Bromatological analysis

Moisture (M) is inversely proportional to the dry matter (DM) measured on a dry basis (d.b.). The DM was measured in seeds dehydrated by both methods using the method of AOAC (1995). Seeds were grounded in a food processor until two-micro size particles were obtained, these were used to determine the crude fiber (CF), the ash (Ash), the crude protein content (Pc), and the ether extract (EE). Also, the total reducing sugars were determined using the Lane and Eynon technique14. These analyses were carried out three times. The total organic carbon (TOC) was calculated using the Eq.(1).

TOC=100-\%C1.8

1

Here, C is the carbon mass.

Mineral analysis (macro and micro)

The mineral content of dehydrated seeds was carried out using the digestion method where seeds were dried, grinded, pulverized, and allocated into an acid mixture of HNO3 and H2O2 to destroy the organic material. Then, they were digested using microwaves with a Microwave Milestone MLS-1200. Digested material was analyzed by optical emission spectroscopy with inductively coupled plasma ICP-OES (Perkin Elmer Optimus 7000), where was determined the concentration of calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn) and iron (Fe). This analysis was performed twice.

Extraction and quantification of proteins

In order to extract the protein content 500μg of the sunflower seed was resuspended in 500μL of a NET-2 extraction buffer (500mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 140mM NaCl, 0.05% NP-40), then were vortexed and centrifuged to 6000rpm for 10min, and the supernatant was removed and transferred to 1.5mL conical tubes, as described by Nambara et al.15. Protein content was determined with a spectrophotometer using the Micro-Bradford technique16 and with modifications introduced by Simonian & Smith (2006). In a microtiter plate (microplate),10 μL of the sample was added and the volume was adjusted to 20 μL using a 150mM NaCl solution. For each well, 180 μL of the Bradford working solution (Bradford Dye Sigma) was added. The absorbance was read at an optical density of 595nm. Bovine serum albumin was used as a calibration reference17, and each determination was made in triplicate.

Protein electrophoresis of sunflower seeds tissues in polyacrylamide gels (PAGE-SDS)

The densitometry and the concentration of proteins in seeds dehydrated by TSD and DEMI-LP were determined.

With the protein extracts obtained, the 12% PAGE-SDS polyacrylamide gels were made (Acrylamide-Bis Acrylamide 30:08, tris–HCl 1.5M pH 8.8, SDS 10%) by conventional methods, and 60mg of protein per lane was used. These samples were denatured for 5min with a denaturing buffer (2.5mL Tris–HCl 0.5M pH 6.8,1mL Bis-mercaptoethanol 5%, 4.5mL distilled H2O, 4mL 10% SDS, 20 μL or 0.0002g bromophenol blue 1%, 8mL Glycerol 10%) consisting in tubes placed over boiling water in a hot dish. The gels were run for 30min at 80V and then for 120min at 100V. Once the shift was over, the gels were stained with Coomassie blue G-250 (C47 H48 N3 O7 S2 Na ) in an aqueous acetic acid solution (10%).

Proteins densitometry

To estimate more precisely the densitometry of the protein shift, the KODAK Molecular Imaging Software, V.4.5. was used, applying to digital photography of the electrophoretic profiles with the equipment (Logic 100 Imaging System), capturing the digital data of the bands, obtaining the average and the standard deviation of each lane.

Results and discussion

Biological material

Ten bulk samples (1kg each) of seeds were collected and transported to the DryLab-AORTech laboratories. Seeds were manually cleaned from foreign matter, eliminating broken or immature seeds, and the moisture was measured. The results ranged from 45.05g/dm3 for control samples with 14.9% d.b. moisture and a mass of 100 seeds of 7.78 ± 0.13g, to 36.43g/dm3 for samples dehydrated for 1.5h in DEM-LP, with a moisture content of 3.92g/dm3 and 100-piece mass of 6.92g4.

Dehydration methods

Thermo-solar system (TSD)

The internal conditions in the dehydration chamber were: the temperature oscillates between (44.1–66.4) °C and 1.00 ± 0.21m/s air flux. After 45min (0.75h), the first sample was withdrawn to be analyzed, this had a moisture of 12.18% d.b. The second sample remained for 4h having 2.30% moisture d.b. With this method, 2h is required to reach the goal of 8% moisture (d.b.)4.

Dehydration by electromagnetic induction and low-pressures (DEMI-LP)

The heating chamber reaches 65°C in 5min, and the internal relative pressure can be reduced from the atmospheric pressure to approximately − 20 in Hg in 3min, maintaining the chamber negative pressure concerning the atmosphere. The combination of low pressure and high temperature produces the evaporation of water, and in this process, the samples eliminate the moisture.

Samples of 1kg at 14.95% 14.95% moisture (d.b.) of sunflower seeds, the first sample were dehydrated by 30min (0.5h) reducing to 10.43%, the second sample remained for 1h, reaching 6.29% and the third sample was dehydrated by 1.5h and the result was 3.92% moisture (d.b.), the necessary time to reach 8% of Moisture was 47min4, then the all others chemical characterizations and few biological were carried out.

High-Resolution transmission electron microscope

Figure1, shows the micrographs of the whole seeds, there can be seen how the hull fiber thickness was evaluated by a 200μm microphotography analysis (500×), there had some changes in thickness, these detected changes explain why the volumetric expansion of whole seeds had increased by around 5%, as reported by Ortiz-Hernandez et al.4.

Open in a separate window

Figure 1

Transmission electron micrographs of sunflower seeds: (a) Control, (b) 4h TSD, (c) 0.5, h and (d) 1h DEMI-LP.

Viability of germination and growth

Table ​Table11 shows the numerical results of the laboratory germination experiment, comparing the two selected drying methods and the different times, showing some interesting data, it can be seen the variation as the time of dehydration increases and moisture decreases, the germination variations are related to humidity and the relationship what time is just a consequence. This Table shows the loss of physiological quality of germination and grow viability, and also indicates that the loss of vigor occurs much faster when the germination decreases18.

Table 1

Averages of the viability percentage for sunflower seeds according to the dehydration treatment used: Thermo-solar (TSD), Electromagnetic Induction, and Low Pressure (DEMI-LP).

SampleTotal seedsNot viable (%)Viable (%)
Control253466
0.5h DEMI-LP253466
1.0h DEMI-LP256040
4h TSD257624

Open in a separate window

The viability of seeds dehydrated for 0.5h with the DEMI-LP method was the same as the control 66%, reducing to 40% after 1h of dehydration. The lowest viability was obtained in seeds dehydrated for 4h using the TSD method, just 24%.

Bromatological analysis

The percentual results obtained in the bromatological determination of the sunflower seeds are shown in Table ​Table2.2. Even though the seeds were dehydrated, the humidity percentage was 10.4% in the sample 0.5h DEMI-LP, 6.29% for 1h DEMI-LP, and 2.31% in the sample 4h TSD.

Table 2

Nutritional content of sunflower seeds dehydrated by Electromagnetic induction (DEMI-LP) and Thermo-solar (TSD).

Sample% DM% M% CF% A% P% TRS% EE% TOCCal
Control85.0514.9528.551.4514.517.9535.7099.19339.72
0.5h DEMI-LP89.5710.4329.873.786.468.8331.7297.90283.20
1.0h DEMI-LP93.716.2924.954.095.193.1932.2297.73242.27
4h TSD97.692.3129.081.155.093.4433.5399.36255.79

Open in a separate window

Dry Matter (DM), Moisture (M), Crude Fiber (CF), Ash (A), Protein (P), Total Reducing Sugars (TRS), Ether Extract (EE), Total Organic Carbon (TOC), and Calories (Cal).

The percentage of ashes was higher in the sample 1h DEMI-LP (4%), followed by 0.5h in DEMI-LP (3.7%), and the lowest concentration was obtained in 4h TSD (1.1%). This parameter indicates the amount of inorganic matter present in the samples14.

In Table ​Table22 In accord with the results of nutrimental content in the sunflower seeds EE content was 35.7% in the control, decreasing in the dehydration treatments being the most notorious in the sample 0.5h DEMI-LP with 31.7%.

The TOC content presented a maximum average value of 99.3% in 4h by TSD and a minimum average of 97.7% in 1h, in DEMI-LP. The importance of TOC derives from the decomposition of plants because it is used as a purity test on which bacterial growth and metabolic activities of living organisms or chemical compounds will depend as mentioned by Hendricks19, that is, the metabolic activity of the sunflower seed was not altered by the treatments used in dehydration.

Mineral analysis (macro and micro)

Table ​Table33 presents the numerical results about minerals content, where the minerals concentrations in seeds are important for animal nutrition due to their vital function in the body. In the sunflower seed, the mineral contribution stands out due to its high content of P, K, Fe, and Zn.

Table 3

Minerals present in sunflower seeds, according to the dehydration treatment used, Thermo-solar (TSD) and Electromagnetic Induction (DEMI-LP).

SampleCa (%)P (%)Mg (%)K (%)Cu (ppm)Zn (ppm)Mn (ppm)Fe (ppm)
Control0.251.100.451.2423.00130.5032.5095.00
0.5h DEMI-LP0.300.820.391.1222.0090.5028.0089.50
1.0h DEMI-LP0.261.070.451.2631.50122.0032.50111.50
4h TSD0.320.870.391.2022.50107.5032.50159.50

Open in a separate window

(Ca) Calcium, (P) Phosphorous, (Mg) Magnesium, (K) Potassium, (Cu) Cooper, (Zn) Zinc, (Mn) Manganese, (Fe) Iron.

Regardless of the dehydration method, Ca concentration in the control was 0.25% and increased as the dehydration time rose, on the other hand, the concentration of P decreased in the process of dehydration concerning the control (1.1%). This is probably due to the P volatility features. Phosphor in sunflower seeds is beneficial for the regulation of nerve impulses and intervenes in muscle activity, recommending its use to athletes or people who perform physical activities constantly20.

Iron is a mineral that occurs in high concentrations in dehydration treatments. In this analysis, the highest amount of Fe occurred in 4h TSD (159.50ppm). In comparison with Fe, the Zn concentration was lower after dehydration concerning the control (130.50ppm). The nutritional requirement in ruminants can be covered through the consumption of sunflower seeds21,22.

Extraction and quantification of proteins.

The extraction of the polypeptide part of the proteins present in the hull and the kernel was determined; their concentrations are shown in Table ​Table44.

Table 4

Concentration of proteins obtained from sunflower seeds.

SampleConcentration hull (μg/μg)Concentration kernel (μg/μg)
Control0.1900.434
0.5h DEMI-LP0.1270.430
1.0h DEMI-LP0.0450.427
4h TSD0.0200.412

Open in a separate window

In Table ​Table44 the results of protein concentration are tabulated in function of type and time of dehydration, from this analysis where determined that the protein present in the hull is much lower and there is a loss drastically in both dehydration systems, 66.8% in 0.5h and 23.7% in 1h, boot in DEMI-LP and for TSD just keep 10.5% of the proteins in the hull. On the other hand, the concentration of proteins in the kernel control samples contain the highest concentration, with just 4 thousandths part (0.004) lower, in other words, keeps 99.1% of proteins with 0.5h of DEMI-LP treatment while the samples with 1h in keeps 98.4%, reduced the protein content 0.007 and for the sample with 4h in TSD loss 0.022µg for each microliter (μg/μg), compared with control data reaching 94.9% of the original protein content.

Protein electrophoresis of sunflower seeds tissues in polyacrylamide gels (PAGE-SDS)

The electrophoretic profiles are observed in Fig.2.

Open in a separate window

Figure 2

(a) Protein gel of sunflower seeds, control, dehydrated (0.5 and 1h) DEMI-LP and 4h TSD. 1) Serine bovine albumin, 68kDa molecular weight. 2) Hull Control, 3) Kernel control, 4) Hull 4h TSD, 5) Kernel 4h TS, 6) Hull DEMI-LP 0.5h, 7) Kernel DEMI-LP 1.0h, 8) Hull DEMI-LP 1.0h, 9) Kernel DEMI-LP 0.5h. (b) Graph illustrating the percentage and absolute value of each protein fraction, based on densitometric data from lane 2 of Fig.2a.

Proteins densitometry

In lane 1 is the 68kDa protein used as a reference. In lanes 4, and 8, there was no expression of protein bands indicating degradation by a dehydration protein weight between 32 and 68kDa. The protein bands can be attributed to the α-β of 11S globulin (Helianthin) as mentioned by Molina23.

With the results of polyacrylamide gels in the sunflower hull it is noticed that lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8 have less intensity.

In Fig.2, the percentage of equivalence of the bands after the analysis of densitometry expressed in protein at a concentration of 60μg/μL of each sample, the values obtained from the densitometric analysis of the peel and almond bands of the sunflower seed are observed; the analysis of the data indicated a better comparison and a numerical appreciation of the bands. The total percentage of each lane in the bands is 100%. Observing from the almond sample in lane 3, the band of protein 4 has the highest percentage (24%) followed by bands 5 and 6 (20.7% and 16.1% respectively).

The protein densitometry numerical values are shown in Table ​Table55.

Table 5

Percentage of equivalence of the bands after the analysis of densitometry expressed in protein at a concentration of 60μg / μL of each sample.

Protein bands (kDa)Lane13579
AlbuminKernel ControlKernel TSD 4hKernel DEMI-LP 1hKernel DEMI-LP 0.5h
68Percentage (%)100.0 ± 06.9 ± 3.60.0 ± 0.00.9 ± 0.31.2 ± 0.5
620.0 ± 016.9 ± 6.80.0 ± 0.019.0 ± 3.417.7 ± 5.4
590.0 ± 014.4 ± 0.938.0 ± 11.423.0 ± 1.223.1 ± 10.8
450.0 ± 024.0 ± 3.426.6 ± 3.218.6 ± 4.125.1 ± 11.2
360.0 ± 018.8 ± 2.212.8 ± 11.416.1 ± 2.513.1 ± 3.9
320.0 ± 019.1 ± 7.322.5 ± 3.222.4 ± 6.619.9 ± 7.4

Open in a separate window

During dehydration, proteins were under high temperatures and pressure being the probable cause of protein denaturation, where the data indicates that the amount of oxygen present in the process is very important.

Conclusions

This obtained data can be useful because the nutrimental content is a very important aspect to consider in food quality, and here are our interpretations of the results, in the electrophoresis study, it was found that the time on the DEMI-LP keeps protein concentration in the kernel, 99.1% in 0.5h and 98.4% for 1h; while in the TSD, more proteins were degraded and lost reaching just 94.9%. Then the sunflower kernel could therefore be used in the elaboration of products with greater added value, destined for human feeding, while the protein present in the hull is much lower (less than 10%) and there are lost drastically in both dehydration systems, 66.8% in 0.5h and 23.7% in 1h boot in DEMI-LP and for TSD just keep 10.5%.

The low degradation of proteins in DEMI-LP can be explained in accord with Morscher et al., the amount of oxygen present in the dry process has an important role in protein oxidation24, another relevant point in the quality of seeds is the viability of germination and grow, in this case, the dehydration treatments affected this parameter, the less affectation by the dehydration method was DEMI-LP due in 0.5h of the treatment 66% of seeds keep the viability of the control samples, the poor germination in the analyzed samples can be attributed to the typical dormant sunflower similar to other commercial seeds25.

Then according to the obtained results, Dehydration type and treatment time affect germination percentages, in the equipment DEMI-LP 0.5 did not affect, maintaining 66%, and before 1h, the percentage reduced to 40% of germinated, while in the TSD system, the germination decrease to 24% after 4h of treatments, this data ca explain that no just the temperature is important to preserve the germination power, in accord with Morscher et al., the amount of oxygen present in the dry process, takes an important role in viability due the proteins oxidation24.

The chemical composition that was found showed that the minerals increased until the water concentration fell and the crude proteins decreased. The carbohydrate study showed that the best results are in 0.5h increasing from 7.95 to 8.83%. After this, the carbohydrate concentration fell by 3.19% in 1h.

In future research linked to the present study, considerating international quality standards established by reputable organizations in the industry. These standards, such as those set by the German Society for Fat Science (DGF) in 1988, the American Society of Petrochemists (AOCS) in 1993, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in 1988, and the Federation of Oil Associations, seeds and fats (FOSFA) in 1998, provide a solid foundation for assessing and comparing the quality of oilseed products internationally. Exploring how their work aligns with these standards and how they can improve to meet them in future research would be a valuable approach to further advancing this field.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Lic. Biol. Elmer Rivera for his contribution in this research work and AGROCIME Group for the facilities and technical assistance with sunflower cultivation and SECAMPO Zacatecas for the facilities and technical assistance to dehydrate sunflower seeds (Thermo-solar Dryer in the municipality of Morelos Zacatecas). A.A. Ortiz-Hernandez, co-author of this research, acknowledges a second postdoctoral scholarship (CVU 255565) from the Mexican Institution, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT).

Author contributions

A.A.O.H. and M.A.A.E. conceived, carried out the experiments and wrote the M.S.; L.D.R. and L.I.E.V. made biochemical and bromatological analysis of samples; C.A.O.O. and A.L.M. supervised the work and edited the manuscript; H.R.V.C. supervised and revised the manuscript, J.J.O.S.: analyzed the samples with the electron microscope. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

1. OCDE-FAO. Perspectivas Agrícolas 2016–2015 OCDE-FAO (2016).

2. Dohlman E, Hansen J, Boussios D. USDA Agricultural Projections to 2021. Diane Publishing; 2021. [Google Scholar]

3. Bartosik, R., Abadía, B., Cardoso, L., de la Torre, D., & Maciel, G. Almacenamiento y acondicionamiento de girasol. In E. Buenos Aires (Ed.), Un enfoque hacia las buenas prácticas (1ra. Ed.). Ediciones INTA. http://repositorio.iniap.gob.ec/handle/41000/1619 (2016).

4. Ortiz-Hernandez AA, et al. Physical characterization of sunflower seeds dehydrated by using electromagnetic induction and low-pressure system. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020;60:102285. doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2019.102285. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Karam MC, Petit J, Zimmer D, Baudelaire Djantou E, Scher J. Effects of drying and grinding in production of fruit and vegetable powders: A review. J. Food Eng. 2016;188:32–49. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.05.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Acevedo-Picon A, Jaime BP, Gelvez-Figueredo JA. Calentamiento por inducción electromagnética: Diseño y construcción de un prototipo. Rev. La Fac. Ing. Fisicomec. 2007;6(1):69–76. [Google Scholar]

7. Hamed, H. H. A., & El-Hawary, M. E. State of the art for tidal currents electric energy resources. In Proceedings of the 24th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), 1119–1124. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering. 10.1109/CCECE.2011.6030636 (2011).

8. Jakubovi L, Gašparec A, Kopas P, Sága M. Optimization of the induction heating process in order to achieve uniform surface temperature. Procedia Eng. 2016;136:125–131. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Naar R, Bay F. Numerical optimisation for induction heat treatment processes. Appl. Math. Model. 2013;37:2074–2085. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2012.04.058. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Senhaji, A. Simulation numérique de la chauffe par induction électromagnétique d’un disque en AISI 4340 [L’école de Technologie Supérieure, Montreal]. http://espace.etsmtl.ca/1933/1/SENHAJI_Achraf.pdf (2017).

11. Shokouhmand H, Ghaffari S. Thermal analysis of moving induction heating of a hollow cylinder with subsequent spray cooling: Effect of velocity, initial position of coil, and geometry. Appl. Math. Model. 2012;36(9):4304–4323. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2011.11.058. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Ortiz-Hernández, A. A. et al. MX/a/2017/009811: Sistema de secado por inducción electromagnética a baja presión (MX/a/2017/009811) (2017).

13. Ríos-García CA, Orantes-García C, Moreno-Moreno RA, Farrera-Sarmiento O. Viabilidad y germinación de semillas de Jopi (Ochroma pyramidale (Cav. ex Lam.) Urb.) (Malvaceae) Lacandonia. 2016;10:7–10. [Google Scholar]

14. Morillas-Ruiz RJ, Delgado-Alarcón JM. Nutritional analysis of vegetable food with different origins: Evaluation of antioxidant capacity and phenolic total compounds. Nutr. Clin. Diet. Hosp. 2012;32(2):8–20. [Google Scholar]

15. Nambara E, Naito S, McCourt P. A mutant of Arabidopsis which is defective in seed development and storage protein accumulation is a new abi3 allele. Plant J. 1992;2(4):435–441. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.1992.00435.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976;254:248–254. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Simonian, M. H., & Smith, J. A. Spectrophotometric and Colorimetric Determination of Protein Concentration. In F. M. Ausubel (Ed.) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, 10.1.1–10.1A.9. 10.1002/0471142727.mb1001as76 (2006). [PubMed]

18. Delouche JC, Caldwelly WP. Seed vigor and vigor test. Miss. Agric. Exp. Stat. 1960;50:10. [Google Scholar]

19. Hendricks, D. Water treatment unit processes physical and chemical. In M. D. Meyer (ed.) 1st ed. (Taylor & Francis, 2006).

20. Cardellá-Rosales, L., & Hernández-Fernandez, R. Bioquímica Especializada. In M. E. Remedios-Hernández (ed.), Especialidades Bioquímicas de Algunos Tejidos (Issue XI, pp. 1284–1288) (2002).

21. Molino A, Chianese S, Musmarra D. Biomass gasification technology: The state of the art overview. J. Energy Chem. 2016;25(1):10–25. doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2015.11.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Delgadillo-Ruíz L, Bañuelos-Valenzuela R, Esparza-Ibarra EL, Bañuelos-Gutierrez H, Muro-Reyes A. Nutrient profile evaluation of agave agasse as alternative feedstuffs for ruminants Resumen. Rev Mex Cienc Agríc. 2015;11:2099–2103. doi:10.9312/remexca.v0i11.778. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Molina MI, Petruccelli S, Añon MC. Effect of pH and ionic strength modifications on thermal denaturation of the 11S globulin of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Agric. Food Chem. 2004;52:6023–6029. doi:10.1021/jf0494175. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Morscher F, Kranner I, Arc E, Bailly C, Roach T. Glutathione redox state, tocochromanols, fatty acids, antioxidant enzymes and protein carbonylation in sunflower seed embryos associated with after-ripening and ageing. Ann. Bot. 2015;116(4):669–678. doi:10.1093/aob/mcv108. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Nithya N, Renugadevi J, Bhaskaran M, Johnjoel A. Influence of temperature and moisture on seed viability period in sunflower seeds. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017;6(12):820–827. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.087. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

Comparison of dehydration systems in quality and chemical effects on sunflower seeds (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Barbera Armstrong

Last Updated:

Views: 5677

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (59 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Barbera Armstrong

Birthday: 1992-09-12

Address: Suite 993 99852 Daugherty Causeway, Ritchiehaven, VT 49630

Phone: +5026838435397

Job: National Engineer

Hobby: Listening to music, Board games, Photography, Ice skating, LARPing, Kite flying, Rugby

Introduction: My name is Barbera Armstrong, I am a lovely, delightful, cooperative, funny, enchanting, vivacious, tender person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.